<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jep Server WordPress &#187; strorage block</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jepserver.net/tag/strorage-block/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jepserver.net</link>
	<description>computer,  server,  technology,  technology  news  and  reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 04:10:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Around the Storage Block</title>
		<link>http://jepserver.net/data-server/around-the-storage-block.html</link>
		<comments>http://jepserver.net/data-server/around-the-storage-block.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 05:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strorage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strorage block]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jepserver.net/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Calvin Zito NetApp is taking a piece of truth and misrepresenting it in a press release.  On March 11th, NetApp isused a press release with the following headline. &#8220;NetApp Named 2009 CRN Channel Champion&#8220;. Yes that is true; they did receive a reward from CRN in the Network Storage Category. It&#8217;s the next piece [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="contentBlock textLevelA" style="text-align: justify;">
<p>By Calvin Zito</p>
<p>NetApp is taking a piece of truth and misrepresenting it in a press release.  On March 11<sup>th</sup>, NetApp isused a press release with the following headline. &#8220;<span><strong>NetApp Named 2009 CRN Channel Champion</strong></span>&#8220;. Yes that is true; they did receive a reward from CRN in the Network Storage Category. It&#8217;s the next piece that&#8217;s misleading.  &#8220;Honored as the Top Vendor in the Network Storage Category&#8221; stretches the truth.  The subtitle &#8220;the Top Vendor&#8221; makes it appear to the quick reader that NetApp owned this category exclusively after all it says &#8220;the top vendor&#8221; and not &#8220;a top vendor&#8221;.  Even the content in the release misleads people into believing the same.  We decided to check it out so went to the CRN ChannelWeb&#8217;s site <span><strong>2009 CRN Channel Champions Awards</strong></span>.  When we got to <span><strong>slide #39</strong></span> we found that CRN said &#8220;NetApp nabbed the Financial Performance trophy for Network Storage&#8221;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be honest with you, I really don&#8217;t know what this award is for but it didn&#8217;t sound like it was what NetApp wants to lead you to believe. So we went to the next <span><strong>slide #40</strong></span> and found that CRN said &#8220;HP picked up the victory for the Network Storage category overall, along with awards for Support Satisfaction and Technical Satisfaction.&#8221;   We also won the 2008 award for the overall category but note that we didn&#8217;t put out a press release either time.</p>
<p>So you be the judge; from your perspective was NetApp&#8217;s statement as &#8220;<span style="text-decoration: underline;">the Top Vendor&#8221;</span> in the Network Storage Category&#8221; fair and accurate?  Never in their press release do they mention that they won the financial performance trophy.  It seems to me that NetApp stretched the truth just a bit here as it was HP who actually picked up the victory for the Network Storage category overall, along with awards for Support Satisfaction and Technical Satisfaction.  I don&#8217;t know what the guidelines are from CRN in terms of what can be said in a press release but all I can say is shame on NetApp and their PR agency for misrepresenting themselves and their award.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jepserver.net/data-server/around-the-storage-block.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
